26,840
edits
Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
— “According to Patristics scholars, opposition to any particular view during the late fourth century was conventionally expressed in a manner, utilizing the rhetorical form known as the ''<mark>psogos</mark>'', whose literary conventions were to <mark>vilify opponents in an uncompromising manner</mark>; thus, it has been argued that <mark>to call Chrysostom an "anti-Semite" is to employ [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anachronistic '''anachronistic'''] terminology in a way incongruous with historical context and record</mark>.”<br> | — “According to Patristics scholars, opposition to any particular view during the late fourth century was conventionally expressed in a manner, utilizing the rhetorical form known as the ''<mark>psogos</mark>'', whose literary conventions were to <mark>vilify opponents in an uncompromising manner</mark>; thus, it has been argued that <mark>to call Chrysostom an "anti-Semite" is to employ [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anachronistic '''anachronistic'''] terminology in a way incongruous with historical context and record</mark>.”<br> | ||
But of course, that doesn't matter to <mark>history “scholars” like Miriam Bodian</mark> with a particular “human rights” <mark>axe to grind (Christianity as “anti-semitic”)</mark>.<br> | But of course, that doesn't matter to <mark>history “scholars” like Miriam Bodian</mark> with a particular “human rights” <mark>axe to grind (Christianity as “anti-semitic”)</mark>.<br> | ||
Such is the <mark>current condition to which Academia has | Such is the <mark>current condition to which Academia has degenerated</mark>. | ||
===Miriam Bodian=== | ===Miriam Bodian=== |