Christian Apologetics: Difference between revisions

Line 181: Line 181:
[[wikipedia:History_of_antisemitism|History of antisemitism]] | Wikipedia<br>
[[wikipedia:History_of_antisemitism|History of antisemitism]] | Wikipedia<br>
[[wikipedia:Antisemitism_in_the_United_States|Antisemitism in the United States]] | Wikipedia
[[wikipedia:Antisemitism_in_the_United_States|Antisemitism in the United States]] | Wikipedia
[[wikipedia:Adversus_Judaeos|Adversus Judaeos] | Wikipedia<br>
— “According to Patristics scholars, opposition to any particular view during the late fourth century was conventionally expressed in a manner, utilizing the rhetorical form known as the ''<mark>psogos</mark>'', whose literary conventions were to <mark>vilify opponents in an uncompromising manner</mark>; thus, it has been argued that <mark>to call Chrysostom an "anti-Semite" is to employ anachronistic terminology in a way incongruous with historical context and record</mark>.”<br>
But of course, that doesn't matter to history “scholars” like Miriam Bodian with a particular axe to grind (Christianity as “anti-semitic”).<br>
Such is the current condition to which Academia has degerated.


[https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/history/faculty/mb35382 Miriam Bodian] UT Professor Emerita, Ph.D. 1988, Hebrew University<br>
[https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/history/faculty/mb35382 Miriam Bodian] UT Professor Emerita, Ph.D. 1988, Hebrew University<br>