Christian Apologetics: Difference between revisions

Line 183: Line 183:
[[wikipedia:Adversus_Judaeos|Adversus Judaeos]] | Wikipedia<br>
[[wikipedia:Adversus_Judaeos|Adversus Judaeos]] | Wikipedia<br>
— “According to Patristics scholars, opposition to any particular view during the late fourth century was conventionally expressed in a manner, utilizing the rhetorical form known as the ''<mark>psogos</mark>'', whose literary conventions were to <mark>vilify opponents in an uncompromising manner</mark>; thus, it has been argued that <mark>to call Chrysostom an "anti-Semite" is to employ [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anachronistic '''anachronistic'''] terminology in a way incongruous with historical context and record</mark>.”<br>
— “According to Patristics scholars, opposition to any particular view during the late fourth century was conventionally expressed in a manner, utilizing the rhetorical form known as the ''<mark>psogos</mark>'', whose literary conventions were to <mark>vilify opponents in an uncompromising manner</mark>; thus, it has been argued that <mark>to call Chrysostom an "anti-Semite" is to employ [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anachronistic '''anachronistic'''] terminology in a way incongruous with historical context and record</mark>.”<br>
But of course, that doesn't matter to <mark>history “scholars” like Miriam Bodian</mark> with a particular <mark>axe to grind (Christianity as “anti-semitic”)</mark>.<br>
But of course, that doesn't matter to <mark>history “scholars” like Miriam Bodian</mark> with a particular “human rights” <mark>axe to grind (Christianity as “anti-semitic”)</mark>.<br>
Such is the <mark>current condition to which Academia has degerated</mark>.
Such is the <mark>current condition to which Academia has degerated</mark>.